Read the following excerpt from an article that appeared in the magazine section of a local daily:
'The ban on single-use plastic is impractical. The purpose of articles such as bags and packing material is ultimately to make human life easier. Plastic articles make this convenient, so they should not be banned.'
Write an analytical paragraph in 100–120 words for the given argument. You could give rationale/evidence that would counter/strengthen the argument.
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · 2026-06-15 07:12 · grounding rag
Model Answer
The argument that a ban on single-use plastic is impractical because plastic makes human life convenient is flawed and shortsighted. While convenience is important, it cannot override environmental and health consequences. Single-use plastics take hundreds of years to decompose, polluting oceans, soil, and harming wildlife. Microplastics have entered the food chain, posing serious risks to human health — the very humans the argument claims to protect. Moreover, sustainable alternatives such as cloth bags, paper packaging, and biodegradable materials are readily available and increasingly affordable. Several countries have successfully implemented plastic bans, proving it is entirely practical. True convenience should be measured not just by ease of use today, but by the livability of the planet tomorrow. Therefore, banning single-use plastic is not only practical but necessary.
---
Explanation
- This is an analytical paragraph, so you must: (1) state the argument, (2) counter/evaluate it with evidence/reasoning, (3) conclude.
- The source passages don't relate to this topic, so you write from general knowledge — which CBSE expects here.
- Examiners look for: a clear counter-argument, 2–3 pieces of evidence/reasoning, and a logical conclusion.
- Keep to 100–120 words; going over wastes time and doesn't earn extra marks.
- Avoid bullet points — write in flowing paragraph form as the question asks for an analytical paragraph.