Social Science (087) — AI-generated practice question

The impact of globalisation has been uneven across different producers and workers in India:

(i) Large Indian IT Company (e.g., Infosys):
Globalisation has greatly benefited large Indian IT companies. They have invested in newer technology, raised production standards, and some have emerged as MNCs themselves. IT-based services like data entry, accounting, and engineering are exported to developed countries, creating new jobs and profits.

(ii) Small Capacitor Manufacturer:
Small producers have suffered due to rising competition from MNCs. They face difficulty competing with cheaper, better-quality foreign goods and often struggle to survive. Many have lost business as MNCs with greater resources dominate the market.

(iii) Garment Factory Worker (e.g., Sushila):
Workers like Sushila face job insecurity, low wages, long working hours, and loss of benefits like health insurance and provident fund. Employers prefer temporary/flexible hiring to cut costs, denying workers a fair share of globalisation's benefits.

Conclusion: While globalisation has benefited skilled, wealthy producers, small producers and workers have largely suffered due to intense competition and flexible labour practices.

Source: Globalisation and the Indian Economy, Chapter 4

---

• Examiners expect three distinct comparisons clearly labelled — award marks are split across the three cases.
• Use textbook examples: Infosys for IT, Sushila's story for garment workers, and the general point about small producers facing competition for the capacitor manufacturer.
• Key contrast: large companies gain, small producers struggle, workers lose out — this directly answers "not uniform."
• End with a brief conclusion on fair globalisation to show complete understanding.