Yes, Horace Danby's own foolishness was largely responsible for his arrest. He was an intelligent, meticulous planner — yet he made critical errors in judgement.
1. Blind trust without verification: Horace never questioned whether the young woman was actually the lady of the house. He simply assumed she was, because she spoke confidently and Sherry (the dog) recognised her.
2. Removed his gloves: Eager to please her and hoping she would let him go, Horace took off his gloves to give her his cigarette lighter. This left his fingerprints all over the room — the key evidence against him.
3. Allowed emotions to override reason: His desperate fear of prison made him easy to manipulate. The woman cleverly used his vulnerability to get the safe opened.
4. A criminal trusting another criminal: Ironically, a thief trusted a stranger completely, violating the very caution that had kept him free for years.
His arrest was not unjust — his greed, gullibility, and carelessness brought it upon himself.
Source: A Question of Trust, Chapter 4
---
Examiners expect you to: